Original Articles

Oncologists’ and Rheumatologists’ Approaches to Rheumatologic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Volume 50 Publish Date: August 31, 2026
Full Text PDF
DOI
Elif Dinçses-Nas ORCID
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, İstanbul, Türkiye image/svg+xml
Gül Güzelant Özköse ORCID
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye image/svg+xml
Dinçses-Nas, E., & Güzelant Özköse, G. (2026). Oncologists’ and Rheumatologists’ Approaches to Rheumatologic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cerrahpaşa Medical Journal, 50, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5152/cjm.2026.26058
Full Text Full-Text PDF

Abstract

 

Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are widely used in oncology but can cause immune-related adverse events (AEs) with autoimmune features. Collaboration between oncology and rheumatology is crucial for the management of rheumatologic adverse events (rAEs). This study aimed to assess the experience, approaches, and shared decision-making processes of rheumatology and oncology physicians in managing rAEs.

Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted via an online survey targeting physicians in rheumatology and medical oncology working in university, training and research, state, city, and private hospitals across Türkiye. A total of 99 participants completed the survey. The questionnaire collected information on demographic characteristics, clinical experience, diagnostic and treatment approaches, and collaboration in the management of rAEs.

Results: Arthritis was the most common rAE in both groups. Myositis and vasculitis were more frequently observed in oncology clinics with a statistically significant difference observed between the 2 groups (P < .0001 and P = .019 respectively). Severe rAEs (grade 3-4) were reported only by rheumatologists (10%), which was statistically significant (P = .034). Regarding education, nearly half of the participants in both groups had never received formal training on rAEs, whereas guideline nonadherence was markedly higher among rheumatologists indicating a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < .0001). The majority of both groups supported the establishment of a multidisciplinary clinic, while oncologists emphasized the need for faster access to rheumatology, with 11% reporting delayed consultation responses.

Conclusion: Educational gaps in rAE management and insufficient interdisciplinary collaboration were common, and most clinicians expressed the need for a multidisciplinary clinic.

 

Cite this article as: Dinçses Nas E, Güzelant Özköse, G. Oncologists’ and rheumatologists’ approaches to rheumatologic adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cerrahpaşa Med J 2026, 50, 0058, doi: 10.5152/cjm.2026.26058

 

Article Info
Published In
Journal Cerrahpaşa Medical Journal
Volume / Issue Volume 50
Pages 1-5
History
Published Online August 31, 2026
Affiliations
Elif Dinçses-Nas ORCID
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, İstanbul, Türkiye
Gül Güzelant Özköse ORCID
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye
Cite this Article
Dinçses-Nas, E., & Güzelant Özköse, G. (2026). Oncologists’ and Rheumatologists’ Approaches to Rheumatologic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cerrahpaşa Medical Journal, 50, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5152/cjm.2026.26058
Outlines